In 2017, a PAGA lawsuit was filed against a non-profit serving individuals with disabilities, claiming failure to provide overtime wages. After the non-profit immediately reconciled the wage issue, the plaintiff’s attorneys added a claim to the lawsuit because the name of the organization was shortened to “Inc.” on paystubs. This additional claim resulted in attorneys receiving approximately $200,000 and workers receiving $61.18 each.
In 2021, a PAGA lawsuit was filed against a staffing company for a minor paystub error, alleging that pay period dates were not labeled correctly. After 2 years of litigation, the parties reached a $600,000 settlement. The plaintiffs’ attorneys pocketed $175,000, while the average worker received $35.75 each.
In 2014, trial lawyers filed a class action PAGA lawsuit against a rideshare company over worker classification. After 3 years of litigation, the parties reached a $7.75 million settlement. The plaintiffs’ attorneys pocketed $2.3 million, while the drivers only received $1.08 each.
In 2011, a trial lawyer filed a PAGA lawsuit against a grocery store chain alleging the supermarket did not provide adequate seating for cashiers. After 8 years of litigation, the parties reached a $12 million settlement. The plaintiffs’ lawyers pocketed $4.2 million, while the cashiers only received on average $62 each.
In 2017, a PAGA lawsuit was filed against a non-profit serving people with disabilities, alleging minor violations of California’s complex wage and hour regulations. After nearly 2 years of litigation, the parties reached a $250,000 settlement. The plaintiffs’ attorneys and settlement administrators pocketed over $113,000, while workers only received from a few dollars to up to $2,000 each. The nonprofit subsequently made the decision to close the service for people with disabilities due to cost pressures associated with the settlement.
In 2019, a PAGA lawsuit was filed against a non-profit that serves individuals in the disabled community, alleging wage-and-hour violations, including non-verifiable claims. After 2 years of litigation, the parties reached a $335,000 settlement. The plaintiffs’ attorneys received $195,000 while workers received less than one hundred dollars each. The non-profit was forced to enter into a payment plan to keep their doors open and continue providing vital services.
In 2019, a PAGA lawsuit was filed against a housing and services provider caring for people with disabilities, alleging missed meal and rest periods despite legal waivers that allow for on-duty breaks to occur. After nearly five years of litigation, the parties will be reaching a $200,000 settlement. The plaintiffs’ attorneys are seeking a staggering 40% of the total recovery, while workers will likely only receive 0.9% (about $18).
In 2016, a trial lawyer filed a PAGA lawsuit against a technology company alleging their employee confidentiality policies violated state statutes. After 7 years of litigation, the parties entered a $27 million settlement. The plaintiffs’ lawyers walked away with $9 million, while workers only received $20 each.
In 2008, a trial lawyer filed a PAGA lawsuit against a specialty coffee retailer for misstating the company’s name on pay stubs and other alleged violations. After 5 years of litigation, a $4.9 million settlement was reached. The plaintiff’s lawyers raked in $1.9 million, while the workers on average only received a couple hundred dollars each.
In 2016, a trial lawyer filed a PAGA lawsuit against a home improvement retailer alleging wage-and-hour violations, including not compensating workers for the time spent walking from the store entrance to clock in. Following 7 years of litigation, the parties reached a $72.5 million settlement. The plaintiff’s lawyers pocketed nearly $24 million, while workers only received up to $77 each.
In 2017, a PAGA lawsuit was filed against a family-owned restaurant business in Southern California. After two years of litigation, the parties reached a $380,000 settlement. The plaintiffs’ attorneys pocketed approximately $180,000, while workers received an average of $38.17 each. The lawsuit has prevented the business from continuing to invest in additional employee benefits, where their funds are better spent to serve their employee population and increase job security.